Archive for the ‘Economics’ Category

A Sneak Peek at the Next Big Thing in Computer Science Education & the Future of the Profession

Friday, April 1st, 2011
As you may know, the Institute for End User Computing, Inc. is most fortunate to have the widest network of operatives placed in government, industry, and academia this side of the CIA ,and do we have a story to break!
In a series of secret Skype communiqués with followup meetings at The Mohonk Mountain House representatives of The Masonic States’ Attorneys General fresh from their work on The Charleston Principles, The League of Illuminated Computer Science Employers whose market capitalization stirs covetous thoughts in the hearts of tax collectors, and the little known Priory of Computer Science Deans have drawn up secret plans to implement a new Millennial Roadmap for Computer Science Education & Practice in a protocol known as The Arkham Charter.
The First Principle of the Charter recognizes that traditional computer science curricula aren’t compatible with the neurobiology of today’s young people. Years of cell phone use and continual texting have led to demonstrable neurological changes in the cerebral cortex rendering the vast majority of individuals under age 35 incapable of performing the kinds of mental gymnastics necessary to develop programming abstractions. Ironically, these same evolutionary changes have enabled them to preform tasks beyond the keen of their elders like syncing tunes across multiple devices and operating complex home theater systems with multiple dueling remote controls. This entire line of research is best summarized by the new mantra of computer science majors and instructors alike — CS is Too Damn Hard.
Strong input from the League of Employers led to the Second Principle of the Charter which states that the first principle doesn’t matter since American CS Grads are Too Damn Expensive. This lead the Priory of Deans to devise a radically re-envisioned curriculum focusing on what people really do. Since wherever possible people don’t write their own code any more, a major re-thinking of student ethics was in order.
As one professor noted, “We can’t keep students from using Google and there is no way we can keep dreaming up new problems that students can complete in the time allotted to a course but which have also not be solved and indexed on the web. And even if we could, they could still hire somebody else to write the code. So we figured, lets just go with it.”
Under the new rules, instead of turning in working code, students will submit the google queries they used to find the answers along with brief descriptions of how they chose and validated the solution they opted to submit. Since some searches can churn out too many results to be filtered in a time effective manner, students will also be given a formal budget which they will be encouraged to use to outsource the completion of their assignments. Whoever comes in with the most  correctly completed assignments with the most money remaining in his or her outsourcing budget at the end of each course will be awarded top marks.
This approach will have the salutary effect of shifting a fraction of tuition dollars to worthy third world students who will be doing our actual coding in the future. Students will also face a new foreign language requirement for technical communication with native speakers of either Chinese, Hindi, Japanese, or Spanish. Other required courses will include “The Psychology of Dealing with Bosses, Employees, Venture Capitalists, and Irate Customers” and the all important, “How to Draft Broad Software and Business Method Patents”.
Naturally, all high school and undergraduate course work will focus on playing games to make the major more appealing, and candidates will be required to purchase an X-Box and Playstation along with a number of popular game titles. Said one Dean, “We actually think this requirement may help attract students to the major and of course we will incorporate green computing and other progressive themes into our assignments to show that computers are more than business tools.”
The Third Principle of the Charter recognizes that it is Too Damn Easy to Learn to Program Poorly. As one employer noted, “It is really hard to find good people who will work for Ramen Noodles and can walk in off the street, implement a new product feature without any bugs, and cycle out for a new assignment elsewhere before their unemployment benefits vest. A CS Degree just doesn’t give us enough detail to go on. I mean, even if their program uses Python, which version did they learn?” A dean expressed similar concerns, “Really all they [students] need are a few good books and a $300 netbook running Linux to learn to program. What with all the great Open Courseware on the web, how are we going to keep justifying raising our tuition at several times the rate of inflation?”
Fortunately, the Masonic Attorneys General were able to suggest the ultimate solution to all of the stake holder’s needs. A system of comprehensive software practitioner licensing with biennial registrations and mandatory Continuing Professional Education accreditation. Non-voting observers from the Confederation of CS Academic Societies were thrilled by this prospect as was the Priory since such a regime would insure them a continual fee generating role in the lifelong study of their members and graduates.
The League was similarly thrilled at the thought of being able to hire a Licensed Software Engineer with an optimally tuned set of credentials for a much lower rate once all programmers were forced to attain such certifications. “Sure they don’t really need to pass a test in each version of every tool they use, but hey, if they didn’t get to it yet, we have every right to take that into consideration when they negotiate their salary,” said one employer. “This is also a great way to keep American grads in the loop, since employers will have to hire one to sign off on any outsourced labor while giving overseas programmers a great reason to seek a student visa to get directly certified through one of our programs,” one Dean candidly confessed.
When asked what was in it for the regulators, several of the Masonic Attorneys General chuckled, “endless licensing and certification provider accreditation fees. No longer will people be able to just go around starting companies to write and sell software all willy nilly without registering with us, although we might carve out a narrow End User Programmer exemption since we don’t really have the resources to prosecute everyone using Spreadsheets and Word Macros for the Unauthorized Practice of Software Engineering. But even with that temporary loophole, licensing represents a huge revenue stream to the states; and with the Tea Party breathing down our necks over deficit spending, we need every red cent we can generate.”
As word of the Arkham Charter’s Millennial Roadmap leaked out, The Knights of the Lambda Calculus vowed to preserve The Old Ways.
N.B. Please note the date of this posting and take it in its intended spirit!

Apple Arrogance

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011
The latest evidence of growing Apple arrogance comes to us from BusinessInsider.com : “Apple Just Declared War On Amazon Kindle

End Users need to reject Apple’s business model of taking a 30% cut of “in application” content sales and recognize the degree to which such hidden expenses are disguising the trust cost of iDevice ownership.

As competing tablets reach End Users we trust that market forces will bring about an end to such overreaching practices.

Growing App Store Concerns

Tuesday, February 1st, 2011

It is now being reported by the New York Times that Apple has blocked Sony from releasing a Sony Reader app for iDevices via Apple’s App Store : “Apple Moves to Tighten Control of App Store”

Businessinsider.com put this quite succinctly : “WAR: Apple Blocks Sony E-Reader App, Kindle Might Be Next”

End Users and Antitrust Regulators should be deeply concerned by Apple’s growing efforts to tie purchases of their current hardware to future purchases of software and media content through their exclusive distribution channels.

To allow this approach to stand as a mater of public policy and common sense would be the equivalent of letting the manufacturer of a refrigerator dictate where one could shop for frozen food or letting car manufactures restrict which brands of gasoline could be used to fuel your vehicle while permitting both to get a cut of your future purchases inflating the price of every purchase without adding any real value in return.

Consumer electronics manufacturers shouldn’t be able to condition the purchase of software and content by End Users of their “platforms” on their receiving a cut of all such sales by restricting third party vendors from directly meeting their customers needs without going through them as an intermediary. The Apple model of a single sanctioned App Store serves as little more than a content tax and anti-competitive barrier that prevents other firms from competing with the platform vendor and its preferred business partners to offer improved quality and value.

Naturally, proponents of the App Store model will argue that it benefits consumers by providing a vital quality control filter, but this end could be achieved through a Certification Mark without intruding into the Freedom of Contract between End Users and Third Party Vendors.

In all likelihood, most End Users would still choose to go the official App Store route, but only by forcing hardware vendors to permit alternate app stores and convenient side loading of content and unmediated purchases of such content can we insure an honest market.

In no other product category would we even contemplate the notion that manufacturing a product entitles its original vendor to exercise this level of control over its use and the aftermarkets for its compliments.

End Users stand at a crossroads between one future where we continue to enjoy the benefits of the free markets that have brought us to where we are today and and a much darker world of monopoly-priced platform-locked content and utter subservience to the whims of platform vendors restricting what programs and content you can see and use to only those apps and media that fit into their self-serving marketing plans.

The battle lines are being drawn and we can’t necessarily count on the courts and government regulators to protect our interests if we willingly embrace products that try to leverage of convenience of an App Store model to enslave us.

The Textbook Crisis

Monday, September 20th, 2010
Anyone on campus will have no doubt noticed the insanely high cost of textbooks this year. Some are now topping $200 and a variety of cheaper pricing options are available in the form of used or rented books and new eBooks.

In some respects we have done this to ourselves by recycling commonly used texts so successfully that original sales are far lower than they might otherwise be. As a result, the first student to buy one, has to pay for all of the “freeloaders” in subsequent semesters who won’t be sending any profit to the textbook publisher.

Sadly, as the high cost of textbooks and recommended readings drives more students into discarding theirs, we are producing a generation of graduates who have missed out on the opportunity to start building a personal library. Of course the content of some subjects is more transitory than others and it is understandable that a legal treaties on this year’s tax law for example will have virtually no long term value. However, in disciplines like computer science and math quite the opposite is true. Indeed, it is sometimes possible to find texts from the 1950′s like William Ross Ashby‘s Introduction to Cybernetics that do a better job of elucidating key ideas than modern sources.

If more students would hold on to their texts and start building personal libraries rather than dumping them into the used textbook market, we might be able to start a “Priced to Own” movement. Just imagine, cheaper books that you can refer to again in the future!

As to the digital editions, we are highly skeptical of schemes that only provision temporary access. If ever there was a medium suited for the long term archiving and automatic hypertextual crosslinking of material it would be the electronic textbook.

There are also fights brewing over the reimportation of textbooks sold abroad since publishers realize they can’t charge $200 to students in the developing world. Publishers fear that transshipment of vastly cheaper texts originally sold in those markets back into the US will further reduce their ability to extract the maximum revenue from each country.

Clearly, we need new economic models that optimize both revenue to publishers and textbook authors as well as the accessibility of the knowledge transmitted in those texts without forcing students who want to keep their books to unfairly subsidize everyone else in the system.

Site of the Day: Hacker News

Friday, September 10th, 2010
If you only have time to skim one news aggregator site, we strongly recommend Hacker News.

The Hacker News highlights a mix of stories ranging from hard core technology postings, patent wars on the legal front, the occasional spot to technology related political commentary, and a healthy sampling of topics related to launching high tech startups. Periodic pointers to postings with advice for students will be of particular interest to many of our readers.